top of page

Sponsored Jobs Chatbot

KW Redesign

  Project Brief  

Indeed Check

Helping job seekers share proof of their credentials with employers on Indeed.

Emp View.png
CheckMockPortfolio.png

Project Summary

I partnered with my product manager to explore the credential verification space. I led extensive user research with both job seekers and employers. These findings led to the creation of a new project on Incubator, Indeed Check. 

Role

I led end-to-end design and user research, conducting primary studies and translating insights into multiple iterations of the product.

Hypothesis

A product that enables job seekers to verify and share their licenses and certifications will enable them to put their best foot forward on a job application and speed up recruiting and application evaluation for employers.

Process Overview

In this project, I worked on a team of 2 engineers, 1 PM, and myself to define, launch, and evaluate 2 MVPs to test our hypotheses. Below is the process we followed. Click on tag to jump to that section.

  User Interviews  

User Interviews

To kick off our discovery research, I partnered with my PM to define research questions that would help us define a compelling user problem for both job seekers and employers. I lead user interviews with both job seekers and employers to uncover pain points

Key Job Seeker Research Questions

  1. Do job seekers currently verify their credentials?

  2. How, if at all, do job seekers share verified credentials with employers? 

  3. Do job seekers have any privacy concerns around sharing their credentials?

  4. What are job seekers' impressions of a hypothetical certification product?

Methodology

I lead 5 remote interviews with job seekers who indicated on Indeed that they had occupational licenses to get a better idea of what this process looked like for them. 

Vector.png

Truck Driver

Commercial Drivers License

Vector.png

Security Personnel

G, D Firearm Licenses

Vector.png

Fitness Instructor

Personal Training Cert

Vector.png

Chef

Culinary Arts Cert, OSHA Cert

Vector.png

Construction Worker

Forklift Cert, OSHA, First Aid

Key Findings from Job Seekers:

  • All 5 job seekers listed their credentials on their resume.

  • All 5 job seekers saw value in verifying their credentials upfront.

  • Job seekers are not generally involved in the process of verifying their credentials.

  • All 5 job seekers reacted positively to a certifications passport concept.

  • 4 of 5 job seekers said they expected to see jobs that matched their certifications upon uploading them.

  • job seekers mentioned they had encountered individuals with fraudulent credentials before.

  • Only 1 job seeker expressed privacy concerns when sharing their certification details.

Key Employer Research Questions

  1. What role do licenses, certifications, and background checks play in the hiring process?

  2. How do employers currently verify JS' credentials? 

  3. How do employers conduct background checks?

  4. How often do employers encounter fraudulent or inaccurate information?

  5. How would employers feel about verifying credentials through Indeed?

Methodology

I conducted 4 remote interviews with employers who hired for roles that required occupational licenses.

Key Findings from Employers:

  • All 4 employers ranked verifying licenses/certifications before hiring someone as 5 (very important).

  • All 4 employers hired for positions where job seekers needed licenses as a condition of employment.

  • All 4 employers needed detailed information about a job seeker's license like where it was issued, expiration, etc.

  • All 4 employers stated they would preference JS with verified credentials over JS without them.

  • All 4 employers monitored when their employees' credentials expired.

  • All 4 employers signaled interest in an Indeed verification product with varying levels of trust.

Vector.png

HR

Gym / Personal Training

Vector.png

HR Manager

Multi-state Pharmacy

Vector.png

Owner

Construction Company

Vector.png

HR Manager

Behavioral Healthcare

Beginning to Define an Opportunity Space

There seemed to be an opportunity to improve the employer experience when it came to verifying job seeker credentials. Job seekers felt comfortable sharing this information, and employers felt their current way of doing this was slow and tedious.

Employees.png

Job Seekers

Are used to sharing their credentials with employers and were very receptive to a certifications passport concept.

noun-magic-5903761 1.png

Opportunity Space

Businesses.png

Employers

Shared that license verification was a very tedious process for them and were eager to find a way to make it more streamlined.

  Employer Survey  

Employer Survey

Following our qualitative, interview findings, we decided to send out a survey to employers who hire individuals with occupational licenses to understand how prevalent our findings were with a larger audience.

Survey Research Questions

  1. How important is it for employers to verify job seeker credentials?

  2. At what phase of the hiring process do employers verify job seeker credentials?

  3. What are the primary employer motivations for verifying job seeker credentials?

  4. What information do employers look for on these credentials?

Methodology

I designed the survey questions and flow in partnership with my PM. We sent the survey out to about 40k employers along with an incentive utilizing Qualtrics.

Pink.png

129 employer responses

Key Survey Findings

  • 75% of employers either agreed or strongly agreed that they would prioritize job seekers with verified credentials over those without.

  • 74% of employers who verified credentials either did so before or after the first interview.

  • 39% employers who verified credentials before the first interview felt it was "extremely important" to do so.

  • The 39% of employers who verified credentials prior to the first interview were motivated by legal compliance and ensuring candidate quality.

  • On these credentials, employers were interested in verifying the issuing state, expiration date, license number matching the candidate's name, and violations.

Firmly Defining our Opportunity Space

The survey data indicated that there was a significant opportunity to help employers verify job seeker credentials before the first interview. We knew our MVP could never replace a background check, but we could at least improve the slow and tedious process employers went through after they established interest in a candidate and before they interviewed them.

  Designing MVP I  

Designing MVP I

After receiving funding for our project, I partnered with my PM and engineering counterparts to understand what was technically feasible and user centric.

Adding Verified Credentials to Profile

The first MVP I ideated centered around enabling job seekers to verify their licenses and certifications as they browsed for jobs on Indeed.com.

Templating Existing Interaction Design

This MVP templated an interaction that the Profile Insights team leveraged and job seekers were used to. On a job that they were interested in, they would see a small banner that encouraged them to verify credentials relevant to the position.

06.png
01.png
03.png
04.png
05.png
09.png

Partnership with Legal

After some ideation and discussion amongst the team, we met with legal to ensure our design and idea was compliant. In this first meeting, we discovered FCRA, a consumer protection law that significantly informed our design strategy and approach. 

Exploring the Possibilities with FCRA

I compiled some flow diagrams that outlined potential solutions and how they might trigger FCRA. Several legal meetings revolved around these diagrams, and they eventually helped us decide to not pursue a solution that would require Indeed to become a Consumer Reporting Agency due to significant risk involved. 

FCRA Scenario Flowcharts.png

MVP I - A Solution without FCRA

Working closely with legal, product, and engineering, the team aligned on an MVP that scraped a link from online databases. This constituted UGC and evidence of a credential, but not necessarily a verified credential. We also shifted to an email acquisition strategy to avoid time-consuming integration work.

JSACQ Email.png
MVP II Step 1.png
MVP II Step 2.png
MVP II Step 3.png

Employer MVP I

We worked with the Employer Home page to integrate a "View Credential" button on the application page, so it would smoothly integrate into employer's existing workflow.

Mult - List View.png
Mult - Link Popover.png

  MVP I Launch  

Product Launch

I worked closely with my PM to define the success metrics for the launch of MVP I. We designed the KRs below to measure the job seekers' perceived value of our MVP while the engineers worked on the employer side.

MVP I Performance

Our initial MVP had some trouble with initial engagement, but outperformed and nearly met our other KRs.

KR1 

2% Acquisition email CTR

1% CTR

KR2

10% credential add rate

31% add rate

KR3

85% JS select "visible"

84%

Understanding "Why" with User Research

I set out to understand why job seekers were underperforming in some of our KRs by triangulating insights from user research studies, specifically focusing on feedback in 3 areas. I put together a deck and presented my findings to the team. 

Top of Funnel

HMW acquire more job seekers at the beginning of the add credential flow?

Adding Credentials

HMW align more to JS expectations when it comes to adding credential links?

Visibility Settings

HMW effectively convey the value of setting credential links to visible?

Triangulating Existing Studies

I synthesized insights from 4 different user research studies around the job seeker experience: a survey sent out to job seekers, 2 different usability studies, and a preference test with 3 different visibility settings iterations. 

Limitation of Analysis

One limitation of this research synthesis​ was that a lot of these studies evaluated our product when it was still a verification concept, whereas our MVP was a link scraping service. Many of these insights were still relevant to our launch MVP though.

  User Research Readout  

User Research Readout

I synthesized existing user research to paint a qualitative picture of what might be going on in these three focus areas. I then presented the findings to the team. 

Focus Area 1: Top of Funnel Key Findings

  • Overall job seekers are very open to the idea of adding credential links to their Indeed Profiles (Usertesting)

  • Some JS showed apprehension about Indeed "verifying their licenses" due to data privacy concerns. However, most JS found value in the proposed service (Survey)

  • JS openness to adding credential links stems from their belief that it would speed up the application process (Survey + Usertesting).

Job Seeker Perception of Value

From our survey of 97 job seekers in this segment, 64% of JS either agreed or strongly agreed that Indeed Check would be helpful in their job search

LineGraph.png

30%

31%

33%

2%

2%

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

Motivations of Undecided JS

This same survey indicated that that 49% of job seekers were unsure, disagreed, or strongly disagreed that they would trust Indeed to verify their licenses. However, these insights felt a bit murkier when it came to our launched MVP, which didn't involve verification and allowed more JS freedom.

Donut Chart.png

49%

43% feared their information would be shared with 3rd parties.

36% didn't trust their personal information would be secure.

9% didn't trust the accuracy of the verification service.

Top of Funel Hypothesis from UXR

The small top of funnel pool is primarily the result of our acquisition strategy and not the result of JS apprehension to add a credential link. With a more contextual acquisition strategy, we could leverage JS’ interest and willingness to add a credential link and significantly increase our top of funnel pool.

Focus Area 2: Adding Credential Links Key Findings

  • Many job seekers expected to add their credential links manually before beginning the Indeed Check flow (Usertesting)

  • While many expected to add their credential links manually, some expressed delight at Indeed sourcing the link for them. (Usertesting)

  • Some JS expected to add more than 1 credential link, especially when the net was cast wider to industries outside of healthcare (Usertesting).

Vector.png
ArrowsNarrower.png

5 JS possessing occupational licenses

5 of 5 job seekers initially expected to add their credential proof manually by uploading a photo or file

4 of 5 job seekers expressed interest in adding more than 1 credential.

Adding Credential Hypothesis

Directly outlining an option to add more than 1 credential link in Indeed Check's UI could result in more credentials added overall by building upon user needs. Additionally, expanding the "manual add" to include a photo upload could more effectively align with JS expectations and reduce Indeed Check's reliance on links that can break.

Focus Area 3: Visibility Settings Key Findings

  • Job seekers are primarily motivated to set their links to visible to speed up the application process and stand out to employers (Survey)

  • JS expect to be able to toggle the visibility of their links at will and are apprehensive about the link being "always visible." (Usertesting).

Idea from Brainstorm

In a brainstorming session, some team members suggested that job seekers may not be setting their credential links to "visible" because they don't know how they look to employers. 

Settings Variant Test

To evaluate this hypothesis, I put together 3 different variants of the settings page and tested them on usertesting.com

Test Methodology

I had 3 job seekers go through the 3 variants below to evaluate how the design impacted a user's willingness to set their credential link to visible.

Variant 02.png

Variant 1

Evaluated if showing JS a preview of what the employers saw impacted their likelihood to set this to "visible."

Variant 01.png

Variant 2

Evaluated if allowing JS more freedom in selecting which credential link employers could see impacted visibility settings.

Variant 03.png

Variant 3 (Control)

The current link sharing permissions page from MVP I.

Test Outcome

8 of 9 users ranked their likelihood to set their credential link to visible as "5 - Incredibly likely" across the 3 variants. The 1 variant where a job seeker voted "4 - likely" was variant 2. This suggested that JS who set their credential links to "hidden" are likely doing so for reasons beyond the UI.

Visibility Settings Hypothesis from UXR

The visibility settings KR performance primarily stems from the lack of JS control after the intake and possibly from not being able to control visibility on a per apply basis. Increasing flexibility in our visibility settings UX could result in an increase in credential links set to visible by leveraging JS’ desire to stand out to employers and speed up the application process.

Designing around UXR Insights

I ideated on how the insights from this research deep dive could affect Indeed Check's design direction for future iterations.

Ideation Mocks 01.png

Add Link Manually

By allowing JS to upload an image or file, we could increase user flexibility in our product while also reducing our reliance on scraped links that could break.

Ideation Mocks 02.png

Add Another Credential Link

Adding a simple CTA on our success screen could take advantage of the JS who wanted to add more credential links and increase the usage of our product.

Ideation Mocks 03.png

Per Apply Toggle

Allowing job seekers to toggle their visibility on a per-apply basis could significantly expand their control over the process and increase their likelihood of setting their credentials to visible. 

  Team Brainstorm  

Post-MVP Brainstorm

After launching our first MVP, I led a brainstorm with cross-functional stakeholders to sharpen our focus on the user problem and generate ideas for future iterations of our product. 

Brainstorm Goal

After the launch of our link scraping MVP, we needed to align on the next iteration of our MVP that did not rely on link scraping (not scalable) and that also leveraged user research insights.

Brainstorm Structure

Research Download

  • What user problem are we solving?

  • Limitations of the link scraping approach

  • User interviews with employers

  • Potential paths forward

UFO.png
Satellite.png

Context Setting

  • Drill down into the experiences for both employers and job seekers.

  • What are their pain points?

  • What are their jobs to be done?

Comet.png

Idea Generation

  • Rooted in the user's pain points, generate as many ideas as possible 

Star.png

Crazy 4's Sketching

  • In 10 minutes, come up with 4 different ways to test your ideas from the previous exercise.

Brainstorm Outcome

Following the brainstorm, my PM and I debriefed and came to the conclusion that there was quite a large assumption baked into our first MVP: We assumed that employers would not trust "high confidence proof" like self-reported photos of licenses or credentials. 

MVP II Strategy

The team agreed that our 2nd MVP should focus on testing whether or not this high confidence proof was enough for employers early in their hiring process. If this MVP succeeded, then likely a product that allowed job seekers to self report was sufficient for our use case. If it didn't, that indicated that a verification service might be necessary.

  Defining MVP II  

Defining MVP II

After the team aligned following the brainstorm, I began designing our next MVP that focused on the photo upload as opposed to the link scraper.

Job Seeker Experience

The job seeker side didn't differ too much from our initial MVP. We still needed the job seeker's license type and issuing state and for them to set their visibility due to legal concerns. We were able to add the "Add more credential photos" CTA to this version based on past research.

Photo Mock 02.png
Photo Mock 01.png
Photo Mock 03.png
Photo Mock 04.png

Employer Experience

This version required more design work on the employer side. We had to create a way for employers to see more than one credential photo and also a method for them to report content. To address the last version's discoverability issues, we also added a tooltip.

Emp Photo Mock 02.png
Emp Photo Mock 01.png
Emp Photo Mock 03.png

New Acquisition Experience

Due to the low CTR on the initial job seeker email and the discoverability issues with employers, we opted to leverage notifications for both job seekers and employers to see if that was more effective.

Job Seeker Notification

Notifs.png
ArrowsNarrower.png

Job seekers received a notification to add a credential photo after applying to a job that required a license or cert.

Employer Notification

Employers received a notification when a JS applied to a position with a credential photo, so they expected it when logging into Employer Home.

  MVP II Launch  

Launching MVP II

We launched MVP II in November of 2023 after defining the OKRs below.

MVP II Performance

Launching this right before the holidays likely hampered our job seeker add rate, but we were able to get statistically significant signal that adding photo evidence of credentials improved job seekers' likelihood of a positive outcome on Indeed 🎉.

KR1 

Get 55k credential photos added by job seekers.

7.3k credentials added 😕

KR2

+5% positive outcomes for JSers with photo adds

+13% positive outcome* 🎉

* in some segments

Project Outcome

We socialized our findings with our partner teams, and they were very excited by the performance of MVP II. Indeeds' Profile team decided to acquire Indeed Check and they're now working on introducing these features into Indeed's job seeker facing products. 

Sponsored Jobs Chatbot

KW Redesign

User Interviews
MVP I
Emp Survey
MVP I Launch
Team Brainstorm
User Research Readou
Defining MVP II
MVP II Launch
bottom of page